V/IB: 01/15/2021 You're right about the wifi being harmful. Where I live the wifi box is in the kitchen. Every time I spend a large amount of time cooking I feel tired, worn out, exhausted, maybe even sickly so. I thought it was because I wasn't experienced or skilled at cooking so I needed to put more energy in so it was tiring. Really it has to be the box. Not sure I can do much about it though, others are almost always home and use the internet connection. Maybe I could see if it's possible to wire ethernet cables or something so that wifi use is decreased significantly. The real reason why all software, games, webpages are bloated, auto updating, always online, is to push out wifi signals in harmful capacities. Wifi may well have been mostly harmless back when they were testing it, nowdays though... Back then people had less than 4 devices as opposed to dozens today. Phones, tablets, laptops are everywhere. They really push those wifi controlled appliances. Wifi hotspots in restaurants, libraries, schools. And the signals are being crowded by all the devices leading to the wifi emitters being higher powered to get the signal through. Back then webpages were kilobytes of data, now a single reddit page takes up megabytes. Back then streaming video was slow or impossible. Now people stream gigabyte videos frequently. Back then people downloaded a program once and then rarely (if ever, so much whining about people using old versions of software) updated it, now AUTOMATIC DAILY updates are a thing for individual programs and even more ludicrously operating systems. With the "current event" children are being made to participate in "remote learning" and employees are frequently in zoom conference meetings. Both are streaming video and worse, sometimes each participant is streaming video of themselves to every other participant. Obscene amounts of data are being blasted through those wifi boxes, obscene amounts of radiation must be too. It's kind of a meme that microwaves interrupt wifi signals. What do microwaves do to food? They vibrate the water to heat up the food, which can end up violently breaking apart the cells destroying the texture and flavour. They say that wifi is much less powerful and directed than microwaves so it's safe. But if it inhibits biological functioning by even a "measly" 5%, that's 5% I want back. When you get overwhelmed you get even more overwhelmed because you don't have the capacity to recover. Downward spiral. High power signal + frequent signal emission = physically sickening I think those people talking about how wifi was harmful a decade ago (that school and society train you to jeer at and dismiss) were controlled opposition whose purpose was to get people to dismiss the idea of wifi being harmful. Wifi may well have been mostly harmless back then when it was a promoted topic. It seems like one of their tactics is to expose you to a truthful idea in a bad way, so that you remember the idea but the idea is so tainted that every time it comes up you dismiss it instead of looking into it again. "Not this dumb thing again, can't there be something else, I already looked at this". The dismissal of the idea is internalized. I feel so dumb and blind for not realizing all this sooner. -------------------------- RANT INCOMING -------------------------- For quite some time now I have struggled with the question of what are the intentions of the open source people. How could they care about software, and software being free to use learn and mess with, yet their works be of similar quality (better in some ways, worse in others) to the clearly sinister and evil corporate software people who want to lock everything down and for no one to understand how anything works. Corporate software is largely funded by tech support costs - they have a very real monetary motivation to make their software bad so they can charge for tech support. It is advantageous for their software to be buggy because they can create a whole industry of technical support staff to support it. They just need their software to catch on and be pushed out. Once it's ingrained in society people and especially businesses will want to use their software because there are so many tech support people available for it, they'll go for the common well trodden solution. The tech support peoples' income is dependent on people continuing to use the product they support, so they have a motivation to be a propagandist and an apologist for it. And of course incompatibilities encourage people to stick with what currently exists. Corpos just have to come in with their seemingly infinite initial resources to take over a market, then they can let it stagnate and rot and be paid great sums for it. (not that money is real, but upholding the illusion that it is valuable to them) Open source / "hobbyist" software has NONE of these motivations. It's the complete opposite (or SHOULD be). They have very finite resources, very finite ability to provide tech support. Every single bug, incompatibility, deficiency is a LIABILITY. People not understanding how stuff works and how to fix it themselves is a LIABILITY. Helping people with tech support takes lots of time and energy. Every problem with the software takes away their time that they could be using to further develop it. And so does people's lack of understanding about how to use computers and software. Why then, does there not exist a simple beginner programming language from the open source people? Corpos had BASIC in the 80s on far weaker hardware, all they would've had to do was make a clone that worked on modern hardware and software. Why then, are their programs so bloated, complicated, unreadable, uneditable? Why then, do they discourage people by saying writing a "big" program is an insurmountable task for a single person and they need corporate support to make things work? If they are so concerned about things being open, shouldn't they realize, that if no one can actually read the code, there is no point in it being open source at all? People reverse engineered and decompiled the mario 64 rom into source code, but the task of figuring out how big open source programs work and how to modify them seems even far larger than that. If they cared about people writing and editing software themselves they would encourage them and facilitate it. They're just putting on the mask that they're a rebel or a contributor, they're just acting. Some may even fool themselves, but it's clear to me that at the core they really do not care about anything that matters. They want to stamp their face and name on things and pretend to be great rather than actually doing things that help. Corpos/open source is just blue lodge red lodge. The opposition and support are controlled by the same people, they are distinct merely to attract egotists of different varieties and trap anyone considering helping into wasting their time or even making things worse. Most of the big decisions with open source come from big organizations that are almost certainly fronts for the nsa or big businesses, and no one high up cares enough to actually point this out. They whine and complain that they're being bullied but then they don't do anything that could help others. All this in addition to that all the bloated software & webpage garbage literally causing direct physical harm through wifi, I think I can say: Their works are evil. They are evil.